Skip to the content.

Repository Boundaries

Current boundary map · 2026-09-17

FlossWare uses multiple repositories deliberately. Repository boundaries are architectural constraints, not suggestions.

Contract families

FlossWare uses a reusable repository-layering convention:

{contract}
{contract}-{language}
{contract}-{domain}
{contract}-{domain}-{language}

The names communicate architectural role:

The normative rule is FlossWare engineering standard ADR-0024.

Loom family

Repository Owns
loom Language-neutral Loom protocol, semantic model, bindings, and conformance
loom-python Python implementation of Loom
loom-ai AI-domain contracts and semantics built on Loom
loom-ai-python Python implementation of the AI-domain contracts

Future implementations such as loom-java, loom-erlang, loom-ai-java, and loom-ai-erlang are peer implementations.

Other active boundaries

Repository Owns
loom-client-setup External-client integration and client-facing setup
loom-setup Machine/runtime installation and bootstrap
model-gateway Provider access, routing, resources/accounts, credential isolation, retries, limits, caching, usage/cost, provenance
evaluation Evaluators, feedback signals, reward attribution, verification semantics
strategy Optimization and selection strategies, including interchangeable adaptive strategies
consensus Multi-model consensus
budget Budget and cost
storage, retrieval, rag Named storage and retrieval capabilities
scraping Discovery and resource acquisition
chunking Provenance-preserving derivation of chunks
structured-output, cache, conversation, streaming Dedicated capability boundaries
observability, resilience, security Cross-cutting operational boundaries
curses-tui, tui-schema Terminal interaction and canonical TUI schema
genetic-optimizer Genetic optimization

Retiring or historical boundaries

These names may still exist in Git history or older repositories, but they are not the default place for new architecture:

Durable human-readable knowledge belongs in the Git-backed FlossWare knowledge vault rather than in a dedicated knowledge software repository.

Boundary rule

When functionality crosses a repository boundary, prefer:

Do not copy implementation into another repository merely to make an integration convenient.